Monday, June 30, 2014

Never in my life would I ever hear of a Pope denying scripture...but it happened!

Francis replied: "The fact is that woman was taken from a rib." Giansoldati wrote that he then laughed "heartily" before saying: "I'm joking. That was a joke."
...

You're bloody kidding me. This was a Pope that said this. A Vicar of Christ, someone elected to lead the Catholic Church. I really can't wrap my mind around this. I really just can't. The Pope. The Pope! The Pope denies Scripture and Catholic doctrine just like that!

Adam and Eve is Catholic doctrine as clear as day. There need not be discussion or refuting of how it is. Adam and Eve is the teaching of the Church as the two first parents. God made Adam and Eve from the rib of Adam. Then the apple, and then Original Sin. Just like that.

The heretical views of Pope Francis are too numerous for me to list without blowing a mental fuse, but they are numerous and they are seriously dangerous. This Pope is dangerous to be around and listen to because he will cause souls to be lost. Myself, at one point, included. I was so outraged with Francis and his heresy. I couldn't believe this man became Pope. I was so disillusioned with this man that if I hadn't discovered traditional Catholicism and their wonderful forums earlier this year, I would've considered going Orthodox. Pray that he resigns and that Christ triumphs.

Pope Francis prays to Satan, not the Trinity. He will deceive souls as long as he lives, but he can get away with it because he is the Pope. This is a man who, even in today's time, would have been defrocked for his statements as a priest.

Supreme Court rules in FAVOR of religion.


This is a good day. The Supreme Court has ruled that religious organizations cannot be forced to cover contraception and contraceptive services under the Affordable Care Act. This means that companies like Hobby Lobby or organizations like the Little Sisters of the Poor will not have their faith impugned because of what the government thinks.

Feminists right now are irate, but they must remember that religion also has rights - even in a secular state. Their own selfishness is not the law of the land, despite what they think. Blocking the conception of a child or wanting it to be killed is not the way to go in this country. We're not setting "women's rights" back 100 years, we're causing its' demise, thanks be to God. Its very idea is nefarious to the idea of a Catholic family. Women were not meant to kill babies, block kids and destroy marriage when it's convenient for them, and if the idea of "women's rights" is mostly that in today's society, then maybe there should be no such thing. 

Maybe it is time for a society that recognizes the Catholic model for family as the norm, where the man is the head of the household, the woman is subservient and recognizes the joy and beauty of motherhood, and the kids are raised to be well-off, godfearing people. We do not need women's rights anymore. We really don't. We can recognize the dignity of women but not submit to the feminist agenda.

You can recognize the beauty, dignity and honor of the Lord's creation without submitting to their false views. Some of the most aesthetically beautiful churches I've ever seen were Protestant, for example. I can admire their beauty when I pass by them on a drive somewhere (or looking on the Internet) but I don't go inside for worship. Secular events, like concerts, sure. 

Sunday, June 29, 2014

Ignorance, thy name is Soulguard.

Denigrating the death of a holy priest is not the way to go.

Indult martyrs pray for us. 
Thinking that someone is not Catholic is the way to go.

It is hard to respect people for who they are when they reappear throughout other forums spreading more calumny.

Sigh. Pray for us, Sts. Peter & Paul.

Friday, June 27, 2014

Gasp! I thought Bergoglio was the pastor of First Matahombres Lutheran Church! He's not? Aww.

www.salon.com/2014/06/22/pope_franciss_liberal_reformer_image_is_all_smoke_and_mirrors_partner/

I was originally going to respond to the article, but then I remembered how much liberal, feminist bullshit gives me a rash.

All you need to know is that these types have a massive contempt for Christ and His Church.

Here's my response in a nutshell:

Dogma can't be changed, disciplines can. Other religions can and will uproot all auspices of doctrine to appease the masses. If it's started by Jesus, it can't change.

The end.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Breaking news: "Bishop" of the Episcopal Church comes out as devout atheist, possibly lunatic

i don't get it

What do I not get? Just this idea that you can somehow not believe in the salvific sacrifice of Jesus Christ but be the bishop of a Christian denomination.

Do I sound pissed off? Absolutely. As Catholics and Christians, are we supposed to be?

How someone can believe what she believes but get so high up in the episcopal - that is to mean "of a bishop" - hierarchy is truly beyond me. Really, it is. It truly is.

It is as if Nicolas Sarkozy forgot how to say Je m'appelle ______.

Heretic Tries to Censor Bishop, Instead of the Other Way Around

www.trunews.com/pelosi-warns-sf-bishop-march-traditional-mariage/

Well, wow...

Not only does a laywoman try to censor a bishop, but this time, it's a non-Christian!

Non-Christian congresswoman from San Francisco Nancy Pelosi thinks she knows more than the archbishop that actually is Catholic, Abp. Cordileone, in trying to stop him from marching for marriage. I just now remembered I wrote this last week and the event already happened, so here's all I will say:

I call Nancy Pelosi a "non-Christian" not as a personal attack. I've never met the woman or her family. I'm sure, her lack of Catholic values aside, she's a wonderful person.

I call her a non-Christian because that's what she is! She does not stand for the Catholic Church at all, and neither does any Catholic in the Democrat Party. She doesn't even stand for Christian values, because the liberal Protestants that corrupt Scripture to fit their own blasphemous happy-go-lucky agenda are not Christians. There is no support for abortion. There is no support for sodomite "rights". There is no support for the neo-pagan liberalism in Nancy Pelosi's world in Holy Scripture. 

Let's get real, she is as for Christian values as the *devout atheist wearing stolen vestments running the Episcopal **church, Kathleen Schori.

*No Christian - nay anyone that believes in God would deny the idea of that God saves them. For a later post.

**I use lower-c for church because honestly, I don't even think most of them are Christians. Nor do I think they have valid orders or a valid Eucharist as per Pope Leo XIII's Apostolicae Curae. Basically, my opinion of them is that they are going every Sunday to a person with a divinity degree that thinks they're clergy. They worship a cookie and grape juice. I can respect the more high-church type for trying to do something with actual Christianity. Those would be the Christians.

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Could Minnesota be a swing state in 2016?

Minnesota.

For reasons unknown to me, myself and God, we're known for being some liberal bastion where there's college kids running around being college kids and vegans eating some French dirt on a plate. While some of that is true, the socially liberal is mostly just Minneapolis in the center of the state.

It is the bastard child of some homosexual Brooklyn neighborhood and Berkeley, CA baptized in a Lutheran church and left to die in the Midwestern winter. Au anglais? It's kind of a liberal stronghold, alone in the state.

I mean, sure, you have the inner-ring suburbs with their poverty and fifties houses that economically, would vote Democrat - hence why DC has carried the Democrat vote in astounding numbers each and every election. [Did any other place in the nation get almost 93% of ONE VOTE?] That's fine. Really, it is. Some aspects of economic liberalism that border on Keynesian are not that bad.

But Minneapolis shouldn't shape the state. People move out of the city, get married and have kids. All those wonderful things. Sometimes, these people will move out of the city into some postwar neighborhood. Some areas of St. Anthony and Brooklyn Center, both inner-ring suburbs are an example of this.

Other times, however, people look at new developments that pop up outside the Metro in places like Sherburne or Wright counties - cities like St. Michael, Elk River or Big Lake, and take their kids there because it's far from the city, you get lots of space and good schools. This phenomenon has been happening really frequently as the previous generation moves, making the suburbs more populous and swinging them to the right.

It's logical. I mean, people often combine incomes to afford houses like these and liberal economics would want that money in higher tax cuts, for starters. Second of all, moral/religious values. Your standard Minnesota Lutheran may admonish me and scold me in an email for this, but I'm coming out with it:

Religion naturally lends itself to conservatism. 

A lot of these people were raised Catholic, or Lutheran and naturally find themselves attracted to conservative social values.

With all that, I think it's possible that MN goes battleground in 2 years. It's very possible and maybe even inevitable. Could Minnesota join its neighbor to the Northwest in voting red? Yes, please.

Friday, June 6, 2014

Sigh.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/06/wisconsin-same-sex-marriage/10093565/

Isaiah 5:20 - "Woe to them who call good evil".

This is horrible. It is horrible because it's another example of our nation's judges exercising misinterpretation of the Constitution and tyranny in order to get their way and enshrine perversion - the sin of homosexual "marriage".

This needs to stop. The next bastard judge that does this again needs to be removed from his duties and disbarred, because judges are attorneys first and foremost. Such a defiling of the Constitution deserves this and I don't think anyone realizes that.

If you can so openly defy the Lord God, who through His only begotten Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ, made marriage a sacrament for a man and woman, to make what you believe, your errors (Error has no rights, since rights are a claim given ultimately by God. - Pope Leo XIII) and your destruction of the Natural Law a public stance through laws and insipid, diabolic, legal verbiage, then by the grace of God, you as a judge need to be fired and disbarred immediately.

You are a scandal, and if you cannot renounce your position - all federal "judges" in America, that is - on perversion of the Natural Law, disavow all legal practice and trying to invalidate what God has ordained - then may God grant your family a thousand years of plague and starvation. This is not personal, it's spiritual. There was a man named Judas Iscariot who betrayed Our Lord like you and he is in Hell.